Physical Pre-Employment Screening and Occupational Testing

Posts Tagged ‘employee drug testing’

KBR vs. Chiasson: The Final Chapter?

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

We have been following court rulings in the area of employee drug and alcohol testing.  There has been a gray cloud, over the industry, with some people thinking that drug testing is a violation of human rights and others thinking that it is necessary for a safe and healthy workplace.  Canada appears to be divided, by the east and west, with provinces in the west, mainly Alberta, favoring drug testing, and eastern provinces, mainly Ontario, favoring the side of employees.  I wanted to update everyone to what has been happening in one of the monumental cases.

When we last touched on the monumental case of Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR) vs. Chiasson, the Alberta Court of Appeal had ruled in favor of KBR.  This ruling has helped to establish legal precedent for the validity of drug and alcohol testing in Alberta.  In May 2008, the Supreme Court of Canada rejected an application by the Alberta Human Rights and Citizenship Commission’s to appeal the ruling further strengthening the argument for pre-employment drug and alcohol testing.

The Human Rights and Citizen’s Commision contended that KBR had discriminated against Mr. Chiasson on the basis of a perceived disability (drug addtiction).  However, the Court of Appeal ruled that Mr. Chiasson is not classified as a disabled person as he is a self-admitted recreational user of marijuana.  Upon termination of employment, KBR did not perceive Mr. Chiasson as a drug addict and therefore had no basis to discriminate based on perceived disability.  The Alberta Court of Appeal stated that, “Extending human rights protections to situations in placing the lives of others at risk flies in the face of logic.  KBR’s policy . . . perceives that persons who use drugs at all are a safety risk in an already dangerous workplace.”

The rejection of appeal by the Supreme Court is a step in the right direction towards pre-employment drug and alcohol testing.  However, work remains to lobby the Alberta government to integrate this decision into the Occupational Health and Safety Act and the Human Right’s, Citizenship and Multiculturalism Act.

Only time will tell, if and when a national precedant will be set in Canada.  “Here’s to a step in the right direction.”

British Columbia Opens Its Arms To Employee Drug Testing

Wednesday, January 28th, 2009

This summer, a monumental agreement was signed in British Columbia. The Substance Abuse Testing and Treatment Program Policy was signed by the Construction Labour Relations Association (CLRA) of B.C. and the Bargaining Council of B.C. Building Trades Unions. This agreement requires workers to be tested after an accident or near miss or if there is reasonable suspicion of on-the-job impairment.

Until now, many companies in British Columbia have been hesitant to allow employee drug testing to occur, fearing that it may tread of employee’s rights. This recent move, is beginning to reflect a change in the thought’s of employers.

The Construction Labour Relations Association and the Bargaining Council of British Columbia Building Trades Unions heralded the policy as the first industry-wide pact on substance abuse in Canada.

Much like their neighbors in Alberta, British Columbian companies are beginning to realize the negative effects of drug use and impairment in the work place. The move towards testing employee’s post-incident, is beginning to pave the way to an embrace of pre-employment screening in safety-sensitive positions.

It is my belief that the more pre-employment drug screening that a company undertakes, the less likely they will be performing post-incident drug tests. If company’s can prevent incident’s from happenning, rather then discipling employee’s when they do, is this not a more effective strategy to workplace safety?

While this agreement, is a tremendous step in the right direction, more needs to be done in an effort to promote workplace safety.

I commend those who signed The Substance Abuse Testing and Treatment Program Policy, but I emplore them to continue the efforts in British Columbia.