Physical Pre-Employment Screening and Occupational Testing

Archive for March, 2009

Two Indian Pilots Fail Alcohol Testing

Monday, March 30th, 2009

I just came across this article and thought it was worth sharing.
View the original article here, or read below.

“In India, an increased frequency of random breath analyzer alcohol tests caught two pilots drunk.

The good news is that they were caught in time. The bad news? They were actually about to fly.

The pilots were working for low-budget Indian airline Spicejet, and were caught on the same day in Delhi and Mumbai; one was a local and the other an expat. Both were caught after failing random alcohol testing conducted by the airline a few minutes before a scheduled flight.

This news is rather chilling, and leads us to question whether this same scenario is happening anywhere else. It gives an entirely new meaning to drinking and driving. If taking the wheel after a few drinks is deemed irresponsible, there is no way to describe drinking and flying, when the lives of almost a hundred people depend on your ability to think clearly.

The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) in India has ordered airlines to step up random alcohol testing for pilots. The DGCA is the regulatory body for air travel in India. They used to conduct these surprise alcohol testing, but after having difficulties with some pilots trying to evade undergoing these tests, the DGCA has decided to ask the airlines to share the responsibility.

The reason behind this tendency to drink has been attributed to the increased stress that pilots have been subjected to after the Indian aviation industry suffered a downturn last year. The pilots seem to have taken to drinking as a way to deal with the possibility of having to face pay cuts since October last year.

Stressed out or not, pilots of all people should be strong enough to refrain from engaging in activities that will decrease their ability to function properly and make wise decisions.  Driving drunk is one thing, but putting hundreds of lives in danger, both in the air and below, is plain unacceptable.”

I couldn’t agree more with the author of this article.  Blaming drinking on stress is no excuse.  What would have happened if they would have taken off, and had problems on the flight?  Could impaired judgment and reduced motor skills have resulted in a tragedy?  Luckily, we will never have to find out.

I can’t imagine what I would be feeling if I would have been scheduled to be a passenger on that plane!

Tragic Death Due to Teen Drug Use

Wednesday, March 25th, 2009

15 year old Trinity Bird died last night after her and some friends took what they believed was ecstasy at a party on the Paul Band First Nation, just outside of Edmonton, Alberta.  The local news  reported that nine girls took pills and three of them were hospitalized.  It is reported that these pills were ‘bad’ ecstasy.

After the incident, one of the girls grandparents reported that “My only hope is that the kids survive.”  He said “I know if my granddaughter survives this, she won’t be doing that again … It’s a hard lesson to learn; she probably just wanted to experiment.”

This has been a hard lesson for the Paul Band First Nation.  My hope is that something good comes out of this tragedy.  Drug abuse has been a concern for the Paul Band First Nation.  The sense that I get from hearing about this story is that drug use is viewed as a part of growing up; a rite of passage.  I never got the sense that drug use was perceived as dangerous.  Ecstasy, after all, is a fairly common drug taken at parties and does not usually have dangerous side effects.

As of late, drug use has been taken too callously.  Today’s youth may have heard that drugs are bad but there is the perception that drug abuse refers to heroin addicts not high school students.  The possibility that marijuana, “shrooms”, or ecstasy can be dangerous, does not appear to be a reality.  While Trinity’s death is a tragedy, it may serve as an example for others about the dangers of drugs and help to save the lives of other young people.

Illegal drugs are not manufactured with government standards in mind.  The quality control is not the same as the pills you are prescribed at your local pharmacy.  Side effects, even as serious as death, can and do happen.  There is no recourse! You can’t sue your drug dealer like you could a pharmaceutical company for not taking enough steps to ensure safety.  While Trinity is not the first young girl to die from drug use, I just hope that her death will not be in vain.

Drugs should not be seen as a rite of passage, or something that everyone needs to experiment with at one time or another.  The negative consequences of drug use do not only apply to addicts.  One bad pill could mean the difference between life and death.

My condolences go out to the family of Trinity Bird.

Update:

A Second girl has passed away from an Ecstasy overdose.  Leah Dominique House, aged 14, died Wednesday night after being taken off life  support.  Crisis team member Virginia Rain described the tragedy as a “wakeup call” for the community to become more involved in the prevention and education of illegal drug use.  The Edmonton Journal notes that in the past four years, at least five teen girls have died from taking ecstasy.  Click for the full story

The Prevalance of Substance Abuse in Canadian Youth

Monday, March 23rd, 2009

I recently did some research on youth substance abuse and youth crime.  The statistics are overwhelming.  It’s incredibly easy to ignore what is going on around you, until it somehow affects your life.  My research was prompted, by what appears to be a staggering increase in crime in Alberta and specifically, Edmonton.

The big question in everyone’s mind, is what is the cause, and what is the solution to this problem?

It is time for society to start being proactive, rather than trying to determine what the most effective way to punish offenders is.

  • In 2002, 15.8% of suicides in Alberta were related to the use of alcohol or other drugs
  • From 2002-2005, the percentage of Albertans who were classified as alcohol dependent rose from 2.6% to 3.5%
  • In 2004, about $30 million of marijuana was seized from grow ops in the Edmonton region.
  • In 2002, 684 homicide incidents in Canada were reported to be drug related.  Cocaine was involved in 60% of these drug related homicides.
  • Most users of cannabis, hallucinogens and speed began use at between 15 and 19 years of age; users of cocaine and ecstasy tended to have begun use in their twenties.

The final statistic is the one that tends to worry me the most.  Often times someone who is 15 is still in junior high school.  Drug use is becoming common place in our nation’s junior high schools.  What a tragedy.

Drug education needs to occur well before children are faced with a decision of whether or not to partake in drug use.  Education needs to happen in the home and in schools.  The trouble is that there is an out-dated concept that says talking to young children about drugs is taboo.  Completely untrue!  If we want drug education to be effective, it needs to be taught, in an age appropriate manner, as young as kindergarten.

Punishment does not seem to act as a deterrent any more.  Drug use and crime continue to grow.  There’s a saying that says, “as long as you continue with the same actions, you will continue receiving the same results.”  It’s time to change our actions.  It’s time to curb a rising problem.

Lance Armstrong Submits to a Hair Drug Test

Wednesday, March 18th, 2009

I just found an interesting article about hair testing in the news:

ARMSTRONG’S HAIR TESTED IN FRANCE

Looks like the trend of hair testing is going to continue to grow on a global scale.

I’ll let you know the results once they are released.

Update:

Lance’s results from the drug test came back clean.

Drug Testing in Schools

Monday, March 16th, 2009

As a follow-up to our blog on drug testing your child, I would like to discuss drug testing in schools.  A little research reveals that there have been a significant number of random drug testing programs implemented in schools in the United States.  The Student Drug Testing Institute was established by the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools in August 2008 to help educational institutions develop, implement and sustain drug testing programs.

The Student Drug Testing Institue states that, “Drug abuse not only interferes with a students ability to learn, but it can also disrupt the teaching environmnet, affecting other students as well . . . Drug testing is one of several tools that schools can use as part of a comprehensive drug prevention effort.  Administrators in schools with an SDT program view testing as a deterrent and believe that it gives students a reason to resist peer pressure to use drugs.  Drug testing can identify students who have started using drugs so that interventions can occur early, or identify students who already have drug problems and the refer them for assessment and treatment . . . Students, along with their parents provide written consent to be voluntarily tested.”

So, what do the statistics from current programs suggest?

  • April 2005: A survey of principals at 54 Indiana High Schools with drug testing programs as part of their substance abuse prevention reported . . .
    • Positive Drug Test Result Rate:
      • 41% decreased
      • 56% remained the same
      • 3% increased
    • Participation in Extra-Curricular Activities:
      • 0% decreased
      • 55% remained the same
      • 45% increased
    • Effects of Drug Testing on Peer Pressure to use Drugs:
      • 91% reported that “testing limits the effects of peer pressure”

While these statistics are only suggestive in nature and casual relationships cannot be established, the preliminary data provides some positive support for the implementation of drug testing in schools as part of a comprehensive substance abuse program.

School drug testing programs in Canada are very rare.  It would be interesting to pilot project a random drug testing program in a local school and determine how the testing effects student attitudes, extra-curricular participation, teaching environment and drug use.

If any school boards, or districts are interested in pursuing a pilot project, SureHire would be happy to work along side you in this effort.  You can contact our office 1-866-944-4473.