Physical Pre-Employment Screening and Occupational Testing

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

British Columbia Opens Its Arms To Employee Drug Testing

Wednesday, January 28th, 2009

This summer, a monumental agreement was signed in British Columbia. The Substance Abuse Testing and Treatment Program Policy was signed by the Construction Labour Relations Association (CLRA) of B.C. and the Bargaining Council of B.C. Building Trades Unions. This agreement requires workers to be tested after an accident or near miss or if there is reasonable suspicion of on-the-job impairment.

Until now, many companies in British Columbia have been hesitant to allow employee drug testing to occur, fearing that it may tread of employee’s rights. This recent move, is beginning to reflect a change in the thought’s of employers.

The Construction Labour Relations Association and the Bargaining Council of British Columbia Building Trades Unions heralded the policy as the first industry-wide pact on substance abuse in Canada.

Much like their neighbors in Alberta, British Columbian companies are beginning to realize the negative effects of drug use and impairment in the work place. The move towards testing employee’s post-incident, is beginning to pave the way to an embrace of pre-employment screening in safety-sensitive positions.

It is my belief that the more pre-employment drug screening that a company undertakes, the less likely they will be performing post-incident drug tests. If company’s can prevent incident’s from happenning, rather then discipling employee’s when they do, is this not a more effective strategy to workplace safety?

While this agreement, is a tremendous step in the right direction, more needs to be done in an effort to promote workplace safety.

I commend those who signed The Substance Abuse Testing and Treatment Program Policy, but I emplore them to continue the efforts in British Columbia.

The Cost of Hiring an Unhealthy Worker

Wednesday, January 28th, 2009

As Canadian businesses begin to feel the effects of an economic downturn, one thing is in the back of everyone’s mind: saving money and cutting costs. Gone is the financial boom we experienced in the early years of the millennium. 2009 is the year to reflect on current business practises in an effort to shrink costs and reduce overhead. But, where is the best place to start?

The average cost to hire a new employee in North America is $4,588.00! This is a staggering number which includes everything from the cost associated with the exiting employee to the costs of hiring and training a new worker and the loss of productivity during the transitional period. In the past, companies have accepted high employee turnover as an uncontrollable cost of doing business. This does not have to be the case. While occasionally people leave a job with little justification, the majority of the time, employee turnover is foreseeable and preventable. The number one secret to long-term employee retention and productivity is to hire qualified, “healthy” candidates.

In the context of employee screening, “healthy” does not mean that a candidate needs to be in peak physical condition, or even that they eat tofu and bean sprouts for lunch. If that were the case, the majority of Canadian businesses would have a non-functional workforce! A healthy worker is someone who is: physically, emotionally and mentally capable of excelling in the position that he or she is hired for.

Take for example, the case of a receptionist who is hired with a new company, let’s call her Susie. Susie is extremely pleasant, has years of experience and is very knowledgeable in her field. In essence, she seems like an ideal candidate. Unfortunately, three months into the job, Susie’s doctor discovers that she has carpal tunnel syndrome. Physically, Susie would be unable to effectively perform the functions needed to excel at her job. The discovery quickly leads to a worker’s compensation claim, followed by time off of work necessary for treatment and recovery. A temporary receptionist is hired to fill in until the doctor gives Susie clearance to return to work.

When Susie was hired, although she seemed ideal, she was not a “healthy” employee. If her company would have pre-screened her for carpal tunnel syndrome, they would have discovered that she was not a suitable candidate for a receptionist position, and would have saved several thousand dollars with the associated costs of Susie’s recovery. The average cost of a worker’s compensation lost time claim alone is $5,574.00, not including the cost of hiring a replacement worker.

Susie’s case is just one of many examples of the cost of “unhealthy” employees in the workplace. Another common example is candidates who struggle with drug and alcohol abuse and/or addiction. Employee drug abuse in the workplace causes five times more workers compensation claims, 36 times higher employee theft, 300 - 400% more health care benefit utilization and a greater chance of workplace violence, with 2/3 of people arrested in workplace violence situations testing positive for illegal drugs.

It is “unhealthy” workers who are the leading cause of workers compensations claims, low productivity, and eventually employee turnover. Companies have the resources available to pre-screen their job candidates, ensuring that they hire “healthy” workers. It is one of the easiest and most effective ways to cut costs and at the same time improve the overall state of a company. Employee pre-screening saves money, cuts costs, increases productivity and improves employee morale, with limited time and effort.